I interpreted her statements differently than you did and was very clear about what I feel was sexist (I called you sexist as well). The reasons you have just listed are my conclusions based on _your_ interpretations. She did not mention presentations nor coding discussions, neither did I. <br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">
<br>
</div>Except you're not being fair in your judgements.<br>
<br>
You accused "cme" of being sexist because she mocked stuff said about<br>
guys by misogynist apologists, because she outlined a male privilege,<br>
and because she noted the between-the-lines bonding that happen in<br>
sexualised presentations (not at pubs) and coding discussions (why would<br>
it being at a pub matter, are women *ahem* excluded from that?).<br>
<br>
Denying "cme" her (equal to mine) observations and calling her a sexist<br>
for mocking other people's stupid excuses for sexism is *not* what I<br>
consider to be "decent".<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div>