<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Le 28/09/09 17:36, Ecaterina Valica a écrit :
<blockquote
cite="mid:a7bce70e0909280836g3d9dbb5k2a8ad370c28d7a42@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 00:42, Perline <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:perline@perline.org">perline@perline.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#edeeff" text="#000000"><font size="-1"><font
face="Verdana">Hello,<br>
Just to explain some basic information:<br>
<br>
A logo needs to be clear and to transmit immediately what we are
talking about.<br>
In this case it is : women, Mozilla.<br>
<br>
So, to see if a logo is a good logo, for the purpose (not for the
aesthetic) just think about somebody who looks at it and just two
questions :<br>
- is it clear it is women concern<br>
- is it clear it is Mozilla concern.<br>
<br>
</font></font></div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
about this: when you look at the Firefox logo, you understand in a
second that it's a Browser concern and a Mozilla concern?<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#edeeff" text="#000000"><font size="-1"><font
face="Verdana">If not, it is not a good logo , in signification matter.<br>
Then after, only after, let's talk about aesthetic <:-)<br>
<br>
</font></font></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I tend to agree with both of you here. Let me explain myself :)<br>
<br>
For the WoMoz logo, it is of course definitively interesting if the
logo can transmit easily - through one way or the other (be it color,
shape, or whatever) - the idea that it stands for a women-related
cause, and also that it is related to Mozilla. <br>
However this is not compulsory for your design, and since you guys will
be the judges for the logos anyway, we'll soon see what prevails:
aesthetics, signification, both, or... none?! <br>
<br>
No, seriously - I can also imagine that a logo that in no way seems
related to women in free software or to Mozilla, but that looks really,
really nice and cool, can win.<br>
<br>
So if I can give a small advice on this one, I think all should just do
what they think is more appropriate, and more of all just have <u>fun</u>!!!
:)<br>
<br>
Delphine<br>
</body>
</html>